Feature Requests

Right now you can bulk delete, or bulk change status, assignment, or project, using the Bulk Action option in the web browser view. We would like to be able to bulk change any field in an app using this method. Right now, any bulk changes to these fields need to be handled with an export and import of a spreadsheet, which is very time consuming. Ideally you could filter for the records you want to change, then choose the field and desired value.

Can a permission be created to allow an admin to give a member access to only view and use a group but not be able to manage a group i.e. not be able to create a group, add apps and members etc. Currently the only way a person will see groups is if you click the manage group permission giving them those rights. This would be useful allowing members to see and use the group function in their dashboard but no management rights. Giving members access to view and use groups (not manage) will allow members to have a different dashboard relevant to that group.

Would be nice to be able to edit directly within data table/spreadsheet view of records without having to open and edit an individual record. Additionally being able to make mass edits such as "find and replace" or copying in data in a field for a bunch of records all at once (as you would be able to in say an Excel spreadsheet)

My client wants a map view of the collected data, showing location pins of all records.

It would be great to adjust a single-choice field to a multi-choice field more easily, or vis-versa, within the app builder. Often after building an app and having had data collected the end user will request to have the field changed to one or the other. This means deleting the field and then importing the collected data to the new field which is cumbersome.

I would like a lasso tool to be able to select points on a map view to group them together and download them.

Currently, in the downloads, you can include the horizontal accuracy in your Excel download. However, this is very broad (5 M, 10M). What would be more useful is to include in that download the actual metadata that you can access by clicking on a single point. This will enable users to see the exact level of accuracy being achieved in the field. This is particularly important for users who require less than 1m of accuracy (the 5m default doesn't demonstrate the level of accuracy, even if the GPS unit itself is capturing the data and says you're within centimeters of a location).

Would be useful to have a function such as SETSTATUSLABEL() where a data event could change the label of one or more status choices. For asset condition evaluations on mobile, instead of "Good", "Fair", "Monitor", "Poor", "Critical", crews could have more descriptive labels when making a selection. Such as "Good (no issues)", "Fair (minor wear or aging)", "Monitor (not urgent, may need repair soon)", "Poor (needs repair soon)", "Critical (immediate action required)". But when reporting on the data, or viewing in the web editor, those verbose status labels are less ideal.

I use the fulcrum web app for data entry and the website being in bright white adds to eye strain. A dark mode for the site and app would be greatly appreciated.